The Pixel Appeal
Something photographers have had to deal with since the digital revolution began is the ever increasing pixel count of the DSLR. It began with the 2.7 mega-pixel D1 and we are now looking at 10.3 megapixels in physically the same sized sensor that we started with. The net effect of this increase in resolution is that whilst the actual pixels on the sensor have become smaller, the tonality of each capture has increased considerably. Definitely something we want. However, having said that, I still believe that much can be done with 4 or 6MPs. More resolution is certainly not a good enough reason to upgrade, unless you just absolutely have to have bigger files. Remember, a 66% increase in pixel count from 6MP to 10MP does not equate to an equivalent jump in resolution. In fact you are only getting 29% more resolution between the D70 and the D80. Do you need it?
The Acid-Test
One of my pet hates is listening to people who extoll the virtues of a certain rival camera brand and how noiseless its high ISO shooting values are. Unsurprisingly the people making these "rah-rah" gestures are seldom ever seen using their cameras at these high ISO values. In fact, all they seem to do with them is take photos of nothing and compare them to other photos of nothing, examining in great detail the size, colour and texture of miniscule dots that appear on their photos of nothing. Aren't cameras meant to be used to take pictures of something other than nothing?
All digital cameras exhibit noise at high ISO values. There is no escaping that, but something I have noticed (since being coerced into examining the miniscule dots of my own pictures by Photoshop weilding critics) is that the high ISO noise we are seeing from newer Nikon DSLR's tends to look a lot more like film grain than the Warholian kalaidoscope of yesteryear's DSLR's. I took the D80 into a very demanding shooting situation during the two days I had with it, namely shooting musicians performing in a dimly lit room. Shooting with the D80 at 1600 ISO produced images that to my eye were very pleasing and also did not require any noise reduction in post processing. All I did was set the D80's in-camera noise reduction to maximum and I shot that way. The sample images top right and bottom are examples of just what can be done using 1600 ISO with the D80. The image in the middle was shot at 400 ISO using flash bounced off the ceiling landing slightly to the front of the performer. On the whole I am very pleased with the results I got here under quite testing conditions.
The day following this shoot I took myself off to the harbour to see how the D80 performed in daylight. Sadly the weather wasn't playing ball, but I did get a few shots at the newer low ISO 100 setting, as well as some experiments using the B&W colour space, together with its various filter settings.
Problem Areas
An area that concerns me deeply with Nikon of late, and I cannot fathom why they are doing this, is the encryption of the RAW NEF files produced by the camera. During the course of my evaluation I discovered that my old version of Nikon Capture 4.0 doesn't open the D80 NEF files. Nor does the RAW converter in Photoshop CS2. Amazingly Google's Picasa can decifer the files and using this you are able to save them to a JPG format. The results, however, aren't great. The JPG's produced this way are dull and muddy and unless you are some sort of Photoshop Guru you would be better off just shooting in JPG to begin with (which is what I had to do).
My opinion is that Nikon Capture NX RAW converter should come with the camera and it should be either free or included in the price. When last did you buy a printer that didn't come with a free software driver? Digital cameras shouldn't be any different.
Another area of concern is the move from CF cards to SD cards. Sure, SD cards might be smaller, but that just means they are easier to lose! When I first got the camera for testing it didn't come with a card, so I thought, great, I am really screwed now! Fortunately my friends at Whysalls loaned me a 2GB card so I was able to go on with the evaluation.
Oh, and of course my favourite nit to pick with Nikon is that like the rest of the consumer-grade SLR's this one won't meter with your older MF lenses. I was really hoping that it would, but it doesn't.
Overall Opinion
The Nikon D80 is, in my opinion, a very capable camera that will probably serve its owners well for years and years. The construction isn't quite in the same league as the professional bodies such as the D2 series or the newer D200, but considering the level of specification available in this little body, I would have no problem packing one into my bag if I was going off to a "big deal" shoot. I forgot to mention earlier that the D80 also supports high speed FP Synch with the SB-800, which means you can use flash on all shutter speeds. I also think that coupled with the 18-200mm DX lens, Nikon have created the ultimate travel camera for photography enthusiasts. Lightweight, versatile and packed full of more features than a soccer mom's SUV.
There were many more things I would like to have tested using the camera if I had the time. For example, I would have loved to shoot a bit of fast action sports like rugby or surfing, just to see how it handles in the speed department, but having used a D70 with a fair degree of success in both those areas, I have little doubt that Nikon would not have gone backwards in this regard.
On the whole this Nikon D80 is a great camera and gets a deserved thumbs up from Nikongear.com!
Many thanks to Nikon South Africa for providing the test D80. |
Sample Pictures
click to enlarge

Shot at 1600 ISO, spot metered off players forearm

Shot at 400 ISO bounced flash off ceiling

Shot at 1600 ISO handheld
|